Bala, N., & Ebsim, Y. (2022, March). The 2021 Canadian parenting reforms: Is shared parenting the new normal? Queen's Law Research Paper Series, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4058375
0 Comments
Faller, Y. N., Wuerch, M. A., Rucklos Hampton, M., Barton, S., Fraehlich, C., Jushka, D., Milford, K., Moffitt, P., & Ursel, J. (2021). A web of disheartenment with hope on the horizon: Intimate partner violence in rural and Northern communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9-10), 4058-4083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518789141
Abstract Intimate partner violence (IPV) has become a worldwide epidemic, yet little is known about the experiences of women survivors living in rural and Northern Canadian communities. Existing statistics suggest that women living in rural areas of the Canadian Prairie Provinces and Northwest Territories (NWT) are at a significantly higher risk of experiencing IPV. To better understand the experiences of IPV in these regions, qualitative interviews were conducted with service providers, including the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Victims Services, Shelter Services, counselors, and others (e.g., physicians). In total, 122 participants were interviewed. These interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach where the data/results were transformed into a pictorial matrix that documents the struggles that service providers endure. The matrix/results highlight how social issues, such as isolation and poverty, contribute to social oppressions, such as lack of resources, transportation, and/or services. As service providers struggle against these forces, they begin to develop feelings of disheartenment. Yet, they continue to fight because there are opposing forces, such as Emergency Intervention Orders, police transportation, and Victim Services, that demonstrate how societal response is improving the lives and increasing safety in rural and Northern communities. Ultimately, the results suggest that to reduce the incidences of IPV, we must go beyond the violent acts and deal with the social contexts in which IPV resides. Request the full article here: A Web of Disheartenment With Hope on the Horizon: Intimate Partner Violence in Rural and Northern Communities | Request PDF (researchgate.net) Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2015). Intimate partner violence and its resolution among African American Women. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 1-8. DOI: 10.1177/2333393614565182
Abstract Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant problem that is difficult to overcome within African American communities. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative systematic review was to synthesize isolated qualitative findings relating to IPV among African American women to make them more meaningful and generalizable. A framework of IPV among African American women resulted from this work, and key elements include the following: ubiquitous and perpetual oppression and abuse contribute to the emergence of IPV, and personal and interpersonal forms of inspiration and support are generally inadequate to prevent or resolve it. Moreover, ambivalence of others, fear, mental health problems, and negative perceptions of helping services are barriers to change. Resolution of IPV is an emergent process that is enhanced by holistic Afrocentric services. Outcomes are safety with strings attached and personal growth for mothers and children. Research hypotheses are inferred from this framework along with implications for clinical practice. Obtain a full-copy of the journal article here: (PDF) Intimate Partner Violence and Its Resolution Among African American Women (researchgate.net) Brassard, A., Tourigny, M., Dugal, D., Lussier, Y., Sabourin, & Godbout, N. (2020). Child maltreatment and polyvictimization as predictors of intimate partner violence in women from the general population of Quebec. Violence Against Women, 26I11), 1305-1323. DOI: 10.1177/1077801219857824 Abstract This study aimed to (a) evaluate the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) and revictimization among a representative sample of 1,001 women living in Quebec, Canada; (b) examine whether IPV was predicted by experiences of child maltreatment; and (c) explore the role of polyvictimization on IPV beyond the effect of any type of exposure. Results indicate the prevalence rates of lifetime IPV (10.5%), IPV over the last year (2.5%), and revictimization (7.2%). All forms of child maltreatment predicted an increased risk of IPV victimization, yet polyvictimization was related to IPV beyond the effects of specific forms of child maltreatment. Request the full text here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334611506_Child_Maltreatment_and_Polyvictimization_as_Predictors_of_Intimate_Partner_Violence_in_Women_From_the_General_Population_of_Quebec Gender politics and child custody: The puzzling persistence of the best-interests standard9/21/2020 E. S. Scott & R. E. Emery (2014). Gender politics and child custody: The puzzling persistence of the best-interests standards. Law and Contemporary Problems, 77(1), 69-108.
"There appear to be two different perspectives on the presumption of shared time parenting, one expressing concern about domestic violence or safety and responsibility, and the other concern about parental alienation from children, or the rights of parents; both are perceived to be problematic to policy reform toward shared parenting (Scott & Emery, 2014).” Read the full article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288688063_Gender_Politics_and_Child_Custody_The_Puzzling_Persistence_of_the_Best-Interests_Standard Judith Hughes & S. Chau (2012). In Critical Social Policy, 32(3), 1-19.
Abstract This article summarizes the findings of a project investigating women’s experiences with the Canadian child protection (CPS) and family law (FLS) systems. We examine both service systems together here because although both privilege children’s best interests as their primary consideration and define the concept similarly, the two systems diverge in their expectations of women relative to child custody. While FLS requires women to accept custody arrangements that provide close and continued contact between themselves and their former abusive partners, CPS expects women to leave these same abusive partners or risk removal of their children. The results of thirty-five qualitative interviews with women demonstrate their struggles, firstly, in having their experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) recognized by professionals in the FLS, and, secondly, in becoming caught between the opposing expectations of CPS and FLS while not receiving help from either. Recommendations for change to improve these services are included in this article. Request a copy of the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264918689_Children%27s_Best_Interests_and_Intimate_Partner_Violence_in_the_Canadian_Family_Law_and_Child_Protection_Systems Beth Archer-Kuhn & Stefan de Villiers (2019). In Cogitatio Press. 10.17645/si.v7i1.1768
Abstract: This article reports on an exploratory, qualitative, multiple-methods study that included individual interviews and a focus group with child protection services (CPS) workers in a large city in Alberta, Canada. The findings illuminate current CPS worker practices in situations of domestic violence where inclusion and exclusion decisions are made for service provision, and the ways in which documents reflect these day-today practices; how service user descriptions are constructed and reconstructed, the social problem of domestic violence conceptualized, and the ways in which professional development training encourages critical thinking about existing practices to create new solutions for families experiencing domestic violence. Thematic analysis reveals three themes about CPS workers' experience: 1) current practices reflect invisibility of men and accountability of women; 2) personal and professional shift in perspectives on who to work with, gender expectations , and how CPS are delivered; and 3) reflexive practice into potential intervention strategies and professional development training. The findings suggest specific recommendations for practice including the need to engage men in child welfare practice, shift perspective about service delivery with families experiencing domestic violence, and account for gender norms and practices in service delivery. Read the full article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330711983_Gendered_Practices_in_Child_Protection_Shifting_Mother_Accountability_and_Father_Invisibility_in_Situations_of_Domestic_Violence Understanding the Parent Experience in Child Custody Decision-Making: How Social Workers Can Help2/4/2020 Beth Archer-Kuhn (2019). In Families in Society, 100(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389419825592
Abstract: Parent perspective and experience is largely absent from the research literature in child custody decision-making, making it challenging for social workers to understand the parent experience. Research often focuses on outcome studies regarding children’s adjustment and well-being, with little attention to the parent voice. This article addresses this gap using a phenomenological approach. Eighteen participants were recruited from a mid-sized community in Ontario through the mandatory information program (MIP). In-depth interviews and thematic analysis reveal five themes: (a) redefining role, (b) the importance of agency, (c) shared decision-making, (d) the battleground—barriers to shared decision-making, and (e) complexities involved in shared decision-making. These findings illuminate shared parenting challenges, highlighting the need for family supports and services in navigating challenging post-separation realities. Read the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331865651_Understanding_the_Parent_Experience_in_Child_Custody_Decision-Making_How_Social_Workers_Can_Help Beth Archer-Kuhn (2018). In the Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2018.1444446
Abstract: In child custody decision-making experiences of domestic violence and high conflict are not the same. Legislative reform has not yet been guided by the parent voice to inform differentiated responses that keep women and children safe. Available literature in child custody decision-making focuses on outcome research regarding children’s adjustment and well-being. Debates about types of post-separation arrangements have yet to find agreement in three under-researched areas: (a) high conflict, (b) domestic violence; and (c) children under four. Yet, Canadian legislation supports shared parenting arrangements that privilege the dominant, powerful parent in situations of domestic violence. Based on a Canadian study that explores the parent perspectives and experiences of child custody decision-making, this paper privileges a sub-group of participants; five women, all survivors of domestic violence; defined here as both physical violence and coercive control. Data collection includes one-on-one tape-recorded interviews. Thematic analysis reveals that shared parenting is neither the goal, nor does it meet the needs of these women. The findings illuminate the importance of differentiating parent experience as distinct groups, and reinforces the notion of the state’s role in the reproduction of gendered power. Legislative reform and collaborative community practices are critical to facilitate healthy differentiated responses. Read the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323531277_Domestic_violence_and_high_conflict_are_not_the_same_a_gendered_analysis Bala, N., Birnbaum, R., Poitras, K., Saini, M., Cyr, F. & Leclair, S. (2017). Shared parenting in Canada: Increasing use but continued controversy. Family Court Review. 55 (4), 513-530.
Read here: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/doi/full/10.1111/fcre.12301 |
Archives
May 2022
|