Dora MY Tam, Leslie Maureen Tutty, Ze Hong Zhuang, & Eva Paz (2015). In the Journal of Family Violence, 31, 527-538. DOI: 10.1007/s10896-015-9794-7
Abstract: Racialized minority women’s experiences with Canadian specialized criminal justice responses to domestic violence have seldom been documented. Informed by an intersectionality framework, this qualitative study presents the struggles of 14 racial minority women from three Canadian cities and their experiences with the police and criminal court’s response to their partner’s acts of domestic violence. The results focus on how well specialized criminal justice responses address the needs of these women and protect them from further violence. Factors that facilitate or deter these women from approaching the criminal justice system for help are highlighted. The implications of these women’s narratives for criminal justice responses to domestic violence are discussed. Request a full copy of the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288180083_Racial_Minority_Women_and_Criminal_Justice_Responses_to_Domestic_Violence
0 Comments
Judith Hughes (2008). Problèmes Sociaux et Intervention Sociales (Social Problems and Social Interventions and Responses) (pp. 315-332) in S. Arcand, D. Damant, S. Gravel, E. Harper (eds.), Saint Foy, Quebec, Canada: Presse de l’Université du Quebec.
Judith Hughes & S. Chau (2012). In Critical Social Policy, 32(3), 1-19.
Abstract This article summarizes the findings of a project investigating women’s experiences with the Canadian child protection (CPS) and family law (FLS) systems. We examine both service systems together here because although both privilege children’s best interests as their primary consideration and define the concept similarly, the two systems diverge in their expectations of women relative to child custody. While FLS requires women to accept custody arrangements that provide close and continued contact between themselves and their former abusive partners, CPS expects women to leave these same abusive partners or risk removal of their children. The results of thirty-five qualitative interviews with women demonstrate their struggles, firstly, in having their experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) recognized by professionals in the FLS, and, secondly, in becoming caught between the opposing expectations of CPS and FLS while not receiving help from either. Recommendations for change to improve these services are included in this article. Request a copy of the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264918689_Children%27s_Best_Interests_and_Intimate_Partner_Violence_in_the_Canadian_Family_Law_and_Child_Protection_Systems Beth Archer-Kuhn & Stefan de Villiers (2019). In Cogitatio Press. 10.17645/si.v7i1.1768
Abstract: This article reports on an exploratory, qualitative, multiple-methods study that included individual interviews and a focus group with child protection services (CPS) workers in a large city in Alberta, Canada. The findings illuminate current CPS worker practices in situations of domestic violence where inclusion and exclusion decisions are made for service provision, and the ways in which documents reflect these day-today practices; how service user descriptions are constructed and reconstructed, the social problem of domestic violence conceptualized, and the ways in which professional development training encourages critical thinking about existing practices to create new solutions for families experiencing domestic violence. Thematic analysis reveals three themes about CPS workers' experience: 1) current practices reflect invisibility of men and accountability of women; 2) personal and professional shift in perspectives on who to work with, gender expectations , and how CPS are delivered; and 3) reflexive practice into potential intervention strategies and professional development training. The findings suggest specific recommendations for practice including the need to engage men in child welfare practice, shift perspective about service delivery with families experiencing domestic violence, and account for gender norms and practices in service delivery. Read the full article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330711983_Gendered_Practices_in_Child_Protection_Shifting_Mother_Accountability_and_Father_Invisibility_in_Situations_of_Domestic_Violence Understanding the Parent Experience in Child Custody Decision-Making: How Social Workers Can Help2/4/2020 Beth Archer-Kuhn (2019). In Families in Society, 100(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389419825592
Abstract: Parent perspective and experience is largely absent from the research literature in child custody decision-making, making it challenging for social workers to understand the parent experience. Research often focuses on outcome studies regarding children’s adjustment and well-being, with little attention to the parent voice. This article addresses this gap using a phenomenological approach. Eighteen participants were recruited from a mid-sized community in Ontario through the mandatory information program (MIP). In-depth interviews and thematic analysis reveal five themes: (a) redefining role, (b) the importance of agency, (c) shared decision-making, (d) the battleground—barriers to shared decision-making, and (e) complexities involved in shared decision-making. These findings illuminate shared parenting challenges, highlighting the need for family supports and services in navigating challenging post-separation realities. Read the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331865651_Understanding_the_Parent_Experience_in_Child_Custody_Decision-Making_How_Social_Workers_Can_Help Beth Archer-Kuhn (2018). In the Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2018.1444446
Abstract: In child custody decision-making experiences of domestic violence and high conflict are not the same. Legislative reform has not yet been guided by the parent voice to inform differentiated responses that keep women and children safe. Available literature in child custody decision-making focuses on outcome research regarding children’s adjustment and well-being. Debates about types of post-separation arrangements have yet to find agreement in three under-researched areas: (a) high conflict, (b) domestic violence; and (c) children under four. Yet, Canadian legislation supports shared parenting arrangements that privilege the dominant, powerful parent in situations of domestic violence. Based on a Canadian study that explores the parent perspectives and experiences of child custody decision-making, this paper privileges a sub-group of participants; five women, all survivors of domestic violence; defined here as both physical violence and coercive control. Data collection includes one-on-one tape-recorded interviews. Thematic analysis reveals that shared parenting is neither the goal, nor does it meet the needs of these women. The findings illuminate the importance of differentiating parent experience as distinct groups, and reinforces the notion of the state’s role in the reproduction of gendered power. Legislative reform and collaborative community practices are critical to facilitate healthy differentiated responses. Read the article here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323531277_Domestic_violence_and_high_conflict_are_not_the_same_a_gendered_analysis Saini, M., Romano, E., Weegar, K., Zak., S., & Gallitto, E. (2019). Child-centered interventions after exposure to intimate partner violence within the context of child custody disputes. In Lyn Greenberg, Barbara Fidler & Michael Saini (Eds). Evidence-Informed Interventions for Court-Involved Families: Promoting Coping and Healthy Child Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Outline of the textbook: Children at the center of high conflict divorce and/or child protection cases face increased risks to both current and future health and adjustment. There is a growing research base regarding these risks and the coping abilities skills that children need for successful adjustment, but training gaps and poorly structured services continue to be serious problems. The specific characteristics of these families, and risks faced by these children, underscore the importance of treatment, psychoeducation, and other services adapted to this population and directed to minimizing risks and promoting healthy functioning, autonomy, and resilience for these children. This book provides a critical, research-informed analysis of the core factors to include when developing child-centered approaches to therapy and other family interventions, both in the formal treatment setting and promoting healthy engagement with the other systems and activities critical to children’s daily lives. The book addresses common problems, obstacles, and the backdrop of support from other professionals or the court, which may be necessary for successful intervention. An international team of renowned authors provide chapters covering a variety of service models and drawing on a wide range of relevant research and literature, addressing the legal context, central issues for treatment and other services, and specialized issues such as trauma, family violence, parent–child contact problems, and children with special needs. The book assembles in one place the best of what is known about intervention for court-involved families, along with practical guidance for using relevant research, understanding its limitations, and matching service plans to families’ needs. Purchase a copy of the textbook here: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/evidence-informed-interventions-for-court-involved-families-9780190693237?cc=ca&lang=en& Leslie Drozd. & Michael Saini (2019). Domestic violence/intimate partner violence & child custody. In Marc Ackerman, Andrew W. Kane & Jonathan W Gould (Eds). Psychological experts in divorce actions (7th ed.). New York, NY: Wolters Kluer.
Overview of the book: The authors report that this book addresses the following:
Learn more about this textbook here: https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/product/psychological-experts-in-divorce-actions-seventh-edition/ Leslie Drozod, Michael Saini, & Nancy Olesen (2016). Parenting plan evaluations: applied research for the family court (2nd Edition). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Order the textbook here: https://www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com/view/10.1093/med:psych/9780199396580.001.0001/med-9780199396580 Bala, N., Birnbaum, R., Poitras, K., Saini, M., Cyr, F. & Leclair, S. (2017). Shared parenting in Canada: Increasing use but continued controversy. Family Court Review. 55 (4), 513-530.
Read here: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/doi/full/10.1111/fcre.12301 |
Archives
May 2022
|